<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Design on Constantin</title><link>https://homepage-947a34.gitlab.io/tags/design/</link><description>Recent content in Design on Constantin</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://homepage-947a34.gitlab.io/tags/design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On the aesthetics of failure modes, or 'ruin value'.</title><link>https://homepage-947a34.gitlab.io/posts/aesthetics-of-failure-modes/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://homepage-947a34.gitlab.io/posts/aesthetics-of-failure-modes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Placeholder post. Thinking of incorporating ruin value theory and Rilke&amp;rsquo;s Apollo, as well as unstructured ideas I&amp;rsquo;ve had about the corruption of sacrosanct spaces, when left unguarded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every system has a way of breaking, and good ones break legibly. A fuse
announces itself. A stuck valve hisses. The interface equivalent is rarer than
it should be: most software fails silently, or worse, cheerfully.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What follows is a short taxonomy of failures I have found beautiful, and what
each one taught me about the thing it belonged to.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>